Effect of Universal Testing and Treatment on HIV Incidence - HPTN 071 (PopART)
Neural-Tube Defects and Antiretroviral Treatment Regimens in Botswana
Virological remission after antiretroviral therapy interruption in female African HIV seroconverters
Do people living with HIV experience greater age advancement than their HIV-negative counterparts?
Prednisone for the Prevention of Paradoxical Tuberculosis-Associated IRIS
Repeat testing of low-level HIV-1 RNA: assay performance and implementation in clinical trials
Enhanced Prophylaxis plus Antiretroviral Therapy for Advanced HIV Infection in Africa
Kidney Diseases Associated with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of a Behavioral Weight Loss Program for HIV-Infected Patients
CD32a is a marker of a CD4 T-cell HIV reservoir harbouring replication-competent proviruses
Life expectancy in HIV-positive persons in Switzerland: matched comparison with general population
Successful Prevention of Transmission of Integrase Resistance in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study
Immunologic Biomarkers, Morbidity, and Mortality in Treated HIV Infection
Rosuvastatin slows progression of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with treated HIV infection
Antiretroviral therapy for the prevention of HIV-1 transmission
HIV Transmission Risk Persists During the First 6 Months of Antiretroviral Therapy
Review of the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Raltegravir in Pregnancy
Use of Abacavir and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Among HIV-Infected Individuals
Patterns of Cardiovascular Mortality for HIV-Infected Adults in the United States: 1999 to 2013
Adjunctive Dexamethasone in HIV-Associated Cryptococcal Meningitis
Outcomes of HIV-associated Hodgkin lymphoma in the era of antiretroviral therapy
CD8 T-Cell Expansion and Inflammation Linked to CMV Coinfection in ART-treated HIV Infection
Ongoing HIV Replication Replenishes Viral Reservoirs During Therapy
Incidence and progression of coronary artery calcium in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected men
Levels of intracellular HIV-DNA in patients with suppressive antiretroviral therapy
Course and Clinical Significance of CD8+ T-Cell Counts in a Large Cohort of HIV-Infected Individuals
Impact of low-level viremia on clinical and virological outcomes in treated HIV-1-infected patients
Predicting the outcomes of treatment to eradicate the latent reservoir for HIV-1
Evaluation of a mosaic HIV-1 vaccine in a multicentre,randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2a clinical trial (APPROACH) and in rhesus monkeys (NHP 13-19)
Published by François RAFFI
Updated: 15 October, 2018
Background : More than 1·8 million new cases of HIV-1 infection were diagnosed worldwide in 2016. No licensed prophylactic HIV-1 vaccine exists. A major limitation to date has been the lack of direct comparability between clinical trials and preclinical studies. We aimed to evaluate mosaic adenovirus serotype 26 (Ad26)-based HIV-1 vaccine candidates in parallel studies in humans and rhesus monkeys to define the optimal vaccine regimen to advance into clinical efficacy trials.
Methods : We conducted a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1/2a trial (APPROACH). Participants were recruited from 12 clinics in east Africa, South Africa, Thailand, and the USA. We included healthy, HIV-1-uninfected participants (aged 18–50 years) who were considered at low risk for HIV-1 infection. We randomly assigned participants to one of eight study groups, stratified by region. Participants and investigators were blinded to the treatment allocation throughout the study. We primed participants at weeks 0 and 12 with Ad26.Mos.HIV (5 × 10¹⁰ viral particles per 0·5 mL) expressing mosaic HIV-1 envelope (Env)/Gag/Pol antigens and gave boosters at weeks 24 and 48 with Ad26.Mos.HIV or modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA; 10⁸ plaque forming units per 0·5 mL) vectors with or without high-dose (250 μg) or low-dose (50 μg) aluminium adjuvanted clade C Env gp140 protein. Those in the control group received 0·9% saline. All study interventions were administered intramuscularly. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability of the vaccine regimens and Env-specific binding antibody responses at week 28. Safety and immunogenicity were also assessed at week 52. All participants who received at least one vaccine dose or placebo were included in the safety analysis; immunogenicity was analysed using the per-protocol population. We also did a parallel study in rhesus monkeys (NHP 13-19) to assess the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of these vaccine regimens against a series of six repetitive, heterologous, intrarectal challenges with a rhesus peripheral blood mononuclear cell-derived challenge stock of simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV-SF162P3). The APPROACH trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02315703.
Findings : Between Feb 24, 2015, and Oct 16, 2015, we randomly assigned 393 participants to receive at least one dose of study vaccine or placebo in the APPROACH trial. All vaccine regimens demonstrated favourable safety and tolerability. The most commonly reported solicited local adverse event was mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site (varying from 69% to 88% between the different active groups vs 49% in the placebo group). Five (1%) of 393 participants reported at least one grade 3 adverse event considered related to the vaccines: abdominal pain and diarrhoea (in the same participant), increased aspartate aminotransferase, postural dizziness, back pain, and
malaise. The mosaic Ad26/Ad26 plus high-dose gp140 boost vaccine was the most immunogenic in humans; it elicited Env-specific binding antibody responses (100%) and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis responses (80%) at week 52, and T-cell responses at week 50 (83%). We also randomly assigned 72 rhesus monkeys to receive one of five different vaccine regimens or placebo in the NHP 13-19 study. Ad26/Ad26 plus gp140 boost induced similar magnitude, durability, and phenotype of immune responses in rhesus monkeys as compared with humans and afforded 67% protection against acquisition of SHIV-SF162P3 infection (two-sided Fisher’s exact test p=0·007). Env-specific ELISA and enzyme-linked immunospot assay responses were the principal immune correlates of protection against SHIV challenge in monkeys.
Interpretation : The mosaic Ad26/Ad26 plus gp140 HIV-1 vaccine induced comparable and robust immune responses in humans and rhesus monkeys, and it provided significant protection against repetitive heterologous SHIV challenges in rhesus monkeys. This vaccine concept is currently being evaluated in a phase 2b clinical efficacy study in sub-Saharan Africa (NCT03060629).